Resources for Hazardous Waste Cleanups
This searchable collection of resources includes regulations, policies, guidance documents, memos, and other resources regarding the Hazardous Waste Cleanup program.
Date | Document or Action | Description | Type of Document |
---|---|---|---|
Multiple | Corrective Action Management Units and Temporary Units in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 264, Subpart S | This webpage contains the regulations found in 40 CFR Subpart S Special Provisions for Cleanup including CAMUs and TUs. | Regulations |
Multiple | Staging piles in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations in Section 264.554 | This webpage contains the regulatory requirements for staging piles found in 40 CFR Section 264.554. | Regulations |
July 15, 1985 | Federal Register: Hazardous Waste Management System; Final Codification Rule (50 FR 28702)(pdf)(32 MB) | This rule adds a new section to Subpart F, Section 264.101, to codify these new standards for permitted facilities containing solid waste management units. The term ‘SWMU’ was first defined in the First HSWA Codification Rule, which was based on the legislative history of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Section 3004(u).2. “Any unit at the facility from which hazardous constituents might migrate, irrespective of whether the units were intended for the management of solid and/or hazardous wastes.” | Regulations |
Multiple | Corrective action for facilities seeking a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act permit (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations section 264.101) | Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities Subpart F - Releases From Solid Waste Management Units | Regulations |
July 26, 1982 | Federal Register: Hazardous Waste Management System; Standards Applicable to Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities; and EPA Administered Permit Programs (47 FR 32274)(pdf)(90.3 MB) | This rule issued interim final standards applicable to owners and operators of new and existing hazardous waste land disposal facilities and the corresponding procedures for permit applications. EPA is also issuing conforming amendments to some existing hazardous waste regulations. In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 264, this rule added Subpart F. | Regulations |
December 1, 1987 | Federal Register: Hazardous Waste; Codification Rule for the 1984 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Amendments (52 FR 45788)(pdf)(16 MB) | This rule codifies further changes to the existing regulations which implement the HSWA provisions relating to corrective action and permitting for RCRA facilities. This rule also includes provisions to implement the statutory requirements pertaining to corrective action for releases beyond the facility boundary, and to corrective action for hazardous waste injection wells. Rule codified’ the 3004(v) provision about off-site contamination. | Regulations |
Multiple | Requirements for corrective action beyond the facility boundary (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations section 264.101(c)) | Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities Subpart F - Releases From Solid Waste Management Units | Regulations |
September 28, 1988 | Permit Modifications for Hazardous Waste Management Facilities; Final Rule (53 FR 37912)(pdf)(70.6 MB) |
This rule provides EPA with the authority to grant a permittee temporary authorization, without prior public notice and comment, to conduct activities necessary to respond promptly to changing conditions. Read the discussion on temporary authorization on pages 37919 through 37921. |
Regulations |
March 24, 1986 |
In this final rule, EPA allows for limited on-site storage without the need for a permit or interim status (90 days for over 1000 kg/month generators and 180/270 days for 100-1000 kg/month generators). On page 10168, EPA states "Of course, no permitting would be required if a generator chooses to treat their hazardous waste in the generator’s accumulation tanks or containers in conformance with the requirements of § 262.34 and Subparts J or I of Part 265. Nothing in § 262.34 precludes a generator from treating waste when it is in an accumulation tank or container covered by that provision." |
Regulations | |
March 7, 1989 | Changes to Interim Status Facilities for Hazardous Waste Management; Modifications of Hazardous Waste Management Permits & Procedures for Post-Closure Permitting: Final Rule (54 FR 9596)(pdf)(91.3 MB) |
Section 3008(h) authorizes EPA to order a facility owner or operator to conduct corrective action during interim status when EPA determines that there is or has been a release of hazardous waste into the environment. Section 270.72(a)(5) promulgated in this final rule allows interim status facilities to make changes in accordance with corrective action orders issued by the Agency under section 3008(h) or other Federal authority (or orders issued by a Director under an equivalent State authority). The discussion about corrective action starts on page 9599 of this Federal Register. |
Regulations |
August 18, 1992 | Federal Register: Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards for Contaminated Debris (57 FR 37194)(pdf)(306 MB) | This document finalized treatment standards under the land disposal restrictions program for certain hazardous wastes listed after November 8, 1984, pursuant to a proposed consent decree filed with the District Court that established a promulgation date of June 1992. It also finalized revised treatment standards for debris contaminated with listed hazardous waste or debris that exhibits certain hazardous waste characteristics, and several revisions to previously promulgated standards and requirements. | Regulations |
February 18, 1994 | Federal Register: Treatability Studies Exclusion Rule (59 FR 8362) | On July 7, 1993, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed revisions to the Treatability Studies Sample Exemption Rule. The rule conditionally exempts small scale treatability studies from Subtitle C regulation. EPA issued a final rule with the principal change to the existing rule being to increase the quantity of contaminated media which are conditionally exempt from Subtitle C regulation when used in conducting treatability studies. | Regulations |
April 29, 1996 | Federal Register: Requirements for Management of Hazardous Contaminated Media (HWIR-Media) (61 FR 18780) | As part of the President’s regulatory reform initiative, the United States Environmental Protection Agency is proposing new regulations for contaminated media, including contaminated soils, ground water, and sediments, that are managed during government-overseen remedial actions. The proposed rule would address contaminated media that are currently subject to regulation as ‘‘hazardous waste’’ under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The rule’s purpose is to develop more flexible management standards for media and wastes generated in the course of site cleanups. | Regulations |
May 26, 1998 | Federal Register: Site-Specific LDR Treatment Variances (63 FR 28556) | This document is in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations regarding land disposal restrictions. EPA added amendments to the rule authorizing treatment variances from the national Land Disposal Restrictions treatment standards. The clarifying changes adopted EPA’s longstanding interpretation that a treatment variance may be granted when treatment of any given waste to the level or by the method specified in the regulations is not appropriate. Application of the national treatment standard could be found to be “inappropriate”, specifically where the national treatment standard is unsuitable from a technical standpoint or where the national treatment standard could lead to environmentally counterproductive results by discouraging needed remediation. | Regulations |
November 30, 1998 | Federal Register: Hazardous Remediation Waste Management Requirements (HWIR-media) (63 FR 65874) (pdf)(597 KB) |
As part of President Clinton’s March 1994 environmental regulatory reform initiative, EPA issued new requirements for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous remediation wastes treated, stored or disposed of during cleanup actions. These new requirements made five major changes:
The RCRA Contained-In Policy applies to contaminated media and debris. Environmental media (water or soil) that contain one or more listed wastes or exhibit one or more characteristics of hazardous waste are managed as hazardous waste. |
Regulations |
February 5, 1999 | Interim Final Guidance for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Environmental Indicators (pdf)(90.9 KB) | Interim final guidance for determining if a facility has met the RCRA corrective action environmental indicators). Two indicators are used: CA725 (Current Human Exposures Under Control) and CA750 (Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control). Environmental indicators are used to measure program performance for Government Performance Results Act purposes. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
January 22, 2002 | Federal Register: Amendments to the Corrective Action Management Unit Rule (67 FR 2962)(pdf)(432 KB) |
Rule amends 1993 CAMU rule in six ways: establishes a specific definition, distinct from the definition of remediation waste, to govern the types of wastes that are eligible for placement in CAMUs; establishes more detailed minimum design and operating standards for CAMUs in which waste will remain after closure, with opportunities for Regional Administrators to approve alternate design standards under certain circumstances; establishes treatment requirements for wastes that are placed in CAMUs, including minimum treatment standards, with opportunities to adjust treatment requirements under certain circumstances; establishes more specific information requirements for CAMU applications and is explicitly requiring that the public be given notice and a reasonable opportunity for public comment before final CAMU determinations are made; establishes new requirements for CAMUs that will be used only for treatment and storage; and, ‘‘grandfathers’’ certain types of existing CAMUs and allows them to continue to operate under the 1993 rule. Rulemaking amends the regulations for ‘‘staging piles’’ to expressly allow for mixing, blending, and other similar physical operations intended to prepare wastes for subsequent management or treatment and adds a new provision allowing offsite placement of hazardous CAMU eligible waste in hazardous waste landfills, if they are treated to meet CAMU treatment standards (somewhat modified). Rule grants interim authorization for CAMU amendments to states that are authorized for the 1993 CAMU rule, and it expedites state authorization for the CAMU rule for states that are authorized for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective action program but not the 1993 CAMU rule. |
Regulations |
April 14, 2005 | Federal Register: Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Hazardous Remediation Waste Management Requirements (HWIR Contaminated Media) (71 FR 19757)(pdf)(145 MB) |
Information Collection Request to solicit comments to:
|
Information Collection Requests |
September 20, 2005 | Federal Register: Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Hazardous Remediation Waste Management Requirements (HWIR-Media) (Renewal)(70 FR 55126)(146 KB) |
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this document announces that an Information Collection Request has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection that was scheduled to expire on September 30, 2005. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, requires EPA to establish a national regulatory program to ensure that hazardous wastes are managed in a manner protective of human health and the environment. Under this program (known as the RCRA Subtitle C program), EPA regulates newly generated hazardous wastes, as well as hazardous remediation wastes (i.e., hazardous wastes managed during cleanup). To facilitate prompt and protective treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous remediation wastes, EPA established three requirements for remediation waste management sites that are different from those for facilities managing newly generated hazardous waste:
In addition, EPA created a new kind of unit called a ‘‘staging pile’’ (40 CFR 264.554) that allows more flexibility in storing remediation waste during cleanup. |
Information Collection Requests |
January 28, 2009 | Federal Register: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Hazardous Remediation Waste Management Requirements (HWIR–Media) (Renewal)(74 FR 4958)(pdf)(144 KB) |
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this document announces that an Information Collection Request has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection that was scheduled to expire on January 31, 2009. This notice describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, requires EPA to establish a national regulatory program to ensure that hazardous wastes are managed in a manner protective of human health and the environment. Under this program (known as the RCRA Subtitle C program), EPA regulates newly generated hazardous wastes, as well as hazardous remediation wastes (i.e., hazardous wastes managed during cleanup). To facilitate prompt and protective treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous remediation wastes, EPA established three requirements for remediation waste management sites that are different from those for facilities managing newly generated hazardous waste:
In addition, EPA created a new kind of unit called a ‘‘staging pile’’ (40 CFR Section 264.554) that allows more flexibility in storing remediation waste during cleanup. |
Information Collection Requests |
November 16, 1987 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit Requirements for State Superfund Actions |
Memoranda regarding RCRA permit waivers. In general, a State authorized to conduct the RCRA base permit program will have the authority to waive RCRA permit requirements for State Superfund actions as long as:
|
Correspondence and Memoranda |
November 3, 1992 | Memo from Lowrance to Hansen about emergency permits (pdf)(39.4 KB) |
This letter details Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Regulations for actions taken in immediate or emergency response to a discharge of hazardous waste, or an imminent and substantial threat of discharge of a hazardous waste. Transportation to a remote site is exempt from permitting, however, RCRA emergency permits (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations section 270.61) can be used for destruction activities. These permits may only be issued when the Region or State finds that an imminent and substantial endangerment to human health or the environment exists, according to the requirements of 40 CFR section 270.61. |
Correspondence and Memoranda |
May 19, 1980 | Hazardous Waste and Consolidated Permit Regulations (45 FR 33290)(pdf)(185 MB) |
Read the discussion in this final rule on emergency permits on pages 33326 and 33327. |
Regulations |
September 24, 1996 | Coordination between Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action and Closure and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Site Activities | This memo discusses three areas: acceptance of decisions made by other remedial programs; deferral of activities and coordination among EPA RCRA, EPA CERCLA and state/tribal cleanup programs; and coordination of the specific standards and administrative requirements for closure of RCRA regulated units with other cleanup activities. The memo also announces a revision to the EPA’s policy on the use of fate and transport calculations to meet the "clean closure" performance standard under RCRA. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
May 4, 1993 | Letter from Lowrance to MacMillan about the Regulations for Corrective Action Management Units and the Management of "As-generated" Hazardous Wastes | This letter discusses that as-generated hazardous wastes cannot be managed in corrective action management units. Only remediation wastes can be managed in CAMUs. The definition of remediation waste is not limited to contaminated environmental media. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
October 18, 1995 | Corrective Action Management Units and Corrective Action Temporary Units | Response to Chemical Manufacturing Association regarding concerns about the Agency’s plans to “disallow continued use of the corrective action management unit provision” that was promulgated on February 16, 1993 (58 FR 8658). | Correspondence and Memoranda |
February 17, 1995 | Memo from Barnes to Niedergang about Corrective Action Management Units |
This letter discusses section 3008(h) orders and that they can be used to establish corrective action management units and other remedial units at facilities which lost interim status. Permits are not necessary if a Section 3008(h) order is in place, but public participation should occur. |
Correspondence and Memoranda |
April 7, 1997 | Letter to Michael W. Steinberg, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, and Douglas H. Green, Piper Marbury, from Fred Hanson, and Timothy Fields, Jr., US EPA re: Issuance of Final HWIR-media Rule | Information and Policy Letters Related to the Final Rule: Requirements for Management of Hazardous Contaminated Media | Correspondence and Memoranda |
October 20, 1997 | Use of Administrative Orders under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Section 7003 (pdf)(5 MB) | Memoranda regarding RCRA permit waivers. In general, a State authorized to conduct the RCRA base permit program will have the authority to waive RCRA permit requirements for State Superfund actions as long as: (1) the State has the authority under its own statutes or regulations to grant permit waivers, and (2) the State waiver authority is used in no less stringent a manner than allowed under Federal permit waiver authority. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
October 29, 1998 | Letter to Elizabeth Cotsworth, USEPA, from James P. Snyder, Director, Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection re: the use of Pennsylvania's Comments as Unqualified Support of the Bright Line Option Set Forth in the Proposed Hazardous Waste Rule | Information and Policy Letters Related to the Final Rule: Requirements for Management of Hazardous Contaminated Media | Correspondence and Memoranda |
September 30, 2003 | Transmittal of Interim Guidance on Financial Responsibility for Facilities Subject to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action (pdf)(295 KB) | Memorandum transmits the attached document entitled “Interim Guidance on Financial Responsibility for Facilities Subject to RCRA Corrective Action.” Financial assurance is an important aspect of the corrective action program. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
December 22, 2006 | Using Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s "Results-Based Approaches and Tailored Oversight Guidance" when Performing Superfund PRP Oversight (pdf)(368 KB) | The purpose of this memorandum is to provide additional information in support of Superfund's Administrative Reform on PRP oversight. Attached is a copy of the Office of Solid Waste's "Results-Based Approaches and Tailored Oversight Guidance," dated September 2003, for facilities subject to corrective action under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
September 14, 2011 | Letter to James P. Snyder, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, from Elizabeth Cotsworth, USEPA re: Clarification of USEPA's Use of Pennsylvania's Comments on the Proposed Hazardous Waste Identification Rule | Information and Policy Letters Related to the Final Rule: Requirements for Management of Hazardous Contaminated Media | Correspondence and Memoranda |
October 19, 1998 | Phase IV Land Disposal Restrictions Rule – Clarification of Effective Dates | This memo clarifies the effective dates for the major provisions of the Phase IV rule. Among other things the Phase IV rule promulgates treatment standards for contaminated soil subject to Land Disposal Restrictions. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
October 1986 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Assessment Guidance (pdf)(7.8 MB) | This guidance document informs RCRA permit writers and enforcement officials of procedures to be used in conducting RCRA Facility Assessments. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
July 1987 | Alternate Concentration Limit Guidance (pdf)(3.4 MB) | This document provides guidance to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act facility permit applicants and writers concerning the establishment of site-specific Alternate Concentration Limits. To obtain an ACL, a permit applicant must demonstrate that the hazardous constituents detected in the groundwater will not pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment at the ACL levels. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
June 15, 1989 | Exemption from Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 264 Requirements for People Engaged in the Immediate Phase of a Spill Response (pdf)(884 KB) | This document consists of letters and Federal Register preamble answering questions concerning the applicability of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to certain situations (e.g., spills) involving remediation of contamination at a facility. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
June 15, 1989 | Applicability of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to Certain Situations Involving Remediation of Contamination at a Facility | Letter from Sylvia K. Lowrance, Director Office of Solid Waste, answering a letter dated May 4, 1989, in which the requestor raised several questions concerning the applicability of RCRA to certain situations involving remediation of contamination at a facility. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 27, 1989 | Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and CERCLA Groundwater Treatment Reinjection (pdf)(745 KB) | Document provides guidance on RCRA Section 3020(b). RCRA section 3020(a) bans hazardous waste disposal by underground injection into a formation which contains an underground source of drinking water (within one-quarter mile of the well), or above such a formation. However, RCRA section 3020(b) exempts from the ban re-injection of treated contaminated ground water withdrawn from an aquifer, if certain criteria are met. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
February 1991 | Guidance on Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Decision Documents: The Statement of Basis Final Decision and Response to Comments (pdf)(2.4 MB) | The primary purpose of the SB/RTC guidance is to standardize the format of the SB and RTC. Remedies selected in the RCRA program may be reviewed by the public on a national as well as a local level. Standardizing these remedy decision documents will: provide consistency among Regions with respect to the organization and content of decision documents, and provide clear and logical presentations of rationales for remedy selection decisions based on facility-specific information and supporting analysis. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 1992 | Final Comprehensive State Groundwater Protection Program Guidance (pdf)(1.4 MB) | These documents are intended to describe the Comprehensive State Groundwater Protection Programs. CSGWPPs are the focal point for a partnership between EPA, the States, Native American Tribes, and local governments to achieve a more efficient, coherent, and comprehensive approach to protecting the nation’s groundwater resources. Protecting groundwater sources usually requires the combined efforts of many partners such as public water systems, communities, resource managers, and the public. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
July 20, 1993 | Waste Management Area and Supplemental Well Guidance (pdf)(2.9 MB) | This document gives an overview of the waste management area and the supplemental well provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C groundwater monitoring regulations of 1988. These provisions were intended to increase flexibility in the RCRA groundwater monitoring program, so that monitoring systems may be better tailored to site-specific conditions and designed to foster the early detection of contaminated releases. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
May 1995 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Inspection Guidance Manual (pdf)(5.6 MB) | The purpose of this guidance this guidance is to delineate inspection activities which are critical for the successful completion of corrective action activities currently underway at many facilities. This guidance is intended to supplement the RCRA Inspection Manual (OSWER 993K2b October 1993) as amended. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 25, 1996 | Additional Information on the Scope and Applicability of the Area of Contamination Concept (pdf)(37.8 KB) | This memorandum confirms that, under current regulations, certain broad areas of contamination may be considered to be Resource Conservation and Recovery Act landfills. Under certain conditions, hazardous wastes may be moved within such areas without triggering RCRA land disposal restrictions or minimum technology requirements. This memorandum also describes the distinctions between the final Corrective Action Management Unit regulations and the AOC approach, and encourages appropriate use of both options to expedite remedial actions. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
April 6, 1994 | Letter from Bussard to DuBoff about Remediation Involving Hazardous Waste Treatment | This letter explains that remediation involving hazardous waste treatment triggers permitting and that determining whether in-situ stabilization is treatment is a site-specific determination. The letter also discusses the regulatory status of the movement of wastes within an area of contamination. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
April 1997 | State Source Water Assessment and Protection Programs Guidance (pdf)(6.9 MB) | The purpose of this document is to provide guidance required by the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 for state Source Water Assessment Programs and for Source Water Petition Programs. This document describes the elements of an EPA-approvable SWAP submittal as well as EPA’s recommendations for what may be included in an SWP Program. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
May 1997 | Best Management Practices for Soil Treatment Technologies (pdf)(1.1 MB) | This document provides guidance on how to design and conduct soil remediation activities at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and other hazardous waste sites so that transfers of contaminants from contaminated soil to other media (i.e., clean soil, air, and surface or groundwater) are minimized. This document also gives advice on the prevention and control of contamination through Best Management Practices that, based on research and past experience, may be best for the selected technology. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
August 1998 | OSWER Directive: Clarification to the 1994 Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Sites and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Facilities (pdf)(124 KB) | This document should be consulted when using the IEUBK model or the ALM. It clarifies the 1994 Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Sites and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Facilities. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
October 14, 1998 | Management of Remediation Waste under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (pdf)(42.9 KB) |
This document consolidates existing guidance on the RCRA regulations and policies that most often affect remediation waste management. The associated chart summarizes the document and can be used to quickly identify possible remediation waste management strategies and to compare one remediation waste management approach to another. This memo provides three categories of information: information on regulations and policies that apply to all remediation waste; information on regulations and policies that apply only to contaminated media; and information on regulations and policies that apply only to contaminated debris. |
Guidance and Policy Documents |
October 15, 1998 | Summary Chart of October 14, 1998 Memorandum, Management of Remediation Waste Under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (pdf)(32.2 KB) | On October 14, 1998, EPA issued a guidance memorandum, “Management of Remediation Waste Under RCRA” which provides information on the RCRA regulations and policies that most often affect remediation waste. The attached chart summarizes the memo and can be used to quickly identify possible remediation waste management strategies and to compare one remediation waste management approach to another. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 10, 1999 | Applicability of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Section 3020(b) to In-Situ Bioremediation Technologies (pdf)(32.7 KB) | Document provides guidance on RCRA Section 3020(b). RCRA section 3020(a) bans hazardous waste disposal by underground injection into a formation which contains an underground source of drinking water (within one-quarter mile of the well), or above such a formation. However, RCRA section 3020(b) exempts from the ban re-injection of treated contaminated ground water withdrawn from an aquifer, if certain criteria are met. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
February 25, 2003 | Final Guidance on Completion of Corrective Action Activities at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities (pdf)(160 KB) | The purpose of this notice is to provide the newly issued ‘‘Guidance on Completion of Corrective Action Activities at RCRA Facilities’’ memorandum to regulators and to the regulated community. The memorandum provides the EPA Regions, the States, Tribes, the regulated community, members of the public, and other stakeholders with guidance on significant issues related to completion of corrective action activities at RCRA facilities. It provides guidance on when each type of completion determination is appropriate. It also discusses completion determinations for less than an entire facility. Finally, it provides guidance on procedures for EPA and the authorized States when making completion determinations. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 22, 2006 | Using Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s "Results-Based Approaches and Tailored Oversight Guidance" when Performing Superfund Potentially Responsible Party Oversight (pdf)(368 KB) | The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with additional information in support of Superfund's Administrative Reform on PRP oversight. Attached is a copy of the Office of Solid Waste's "Results-Based Approaches and Tailored Oversight Guidance," dated September 2003, for facilities subject to corrective action under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 27, 2000 | Applicability of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Section 3020(b) to in-Situ Treatment of Groundwater (pdf)(557 KB) | Document provides guidance on RCRA Section 3020(b). RCRA section 3020(a) bans hazardous waste disposal by underground injection into a formation which contains an underground source of drinking water (within one-quarter mile of the well), or above such a formation. However, RCRA section 3020(b) exempts from the ban re-injection of treated contaminated ground water withdrawn from an aquifer, if certain criteria are met. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
August 28, 2009 | Ecological Considerations of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Remedies (pdf)(1.2 MB) | This memorandum confirms that, under existing regulations and guidance, ecological considerations are an integral part of Corrective Action under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), including the attendant final remedies, and to identify the various resource tools/ guidance that may be used in conducting such assessments. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 31, 1999 | Office of Inspector General Audit Report: Superfund Sites Deferred to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (pdf)(125 KB) | EPA developed a policy to “...maximize the number of site responses achieved through the RCRA corrective action authorities, thus preserving the CERCLA Fund for sites for which no other authority is available.” Sites had to be subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA Subtitle C in order to be deferred. The Agency’s Superfund program has transferred cleanup responsibility for approximately 3,000 sites to the RCRA program. | Office of the Inspector General and Government Accountability Office Documents |
August 2000 | U.S. Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters HAZARDOUS WASTE EPA Has Removed Some Barriers to Cleanups (pdf)(441 KB) |
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to remove barriers to hazardous waste cleanup, focusing on: (1) cleanups of remediation waste at sites subject to the three Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requirements; and (2) the management factors that had slowed the pace of cleanups under the corrective action program in particular. | Office of the Inspector General and Government Accountability Office Documents |
September 25, 2002 | Office of Inspector General Recommendations Concerning Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Environmental Indicators (pdf)(15.4 KB) | Memo reiterates a number of important messages concerning our RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicators, most of which were conveyed in the September 29, 2000, Office of Inspector General Audit Report titled, “RCRA Corrective Action Focuses on Interim Priorities - Better Integration with Final Goals Needed.” | Office of the Inspector General and Government Accountability Office Documents |
June 1988 | Guidelines for Groundwater Classification Under the EPA Groundwater Protection Strategy (pdf)(10.3 MB) | The purpose of this document is to further define the classes, concepts, and key terms related to the classification system outlined in the 1984 Groundwater Protection Strategy, and to describe the procedures and information needs for classifying groundwater. | General Background Documents |
July 1991 | Protecting the Nation's Groundwater: EPA's Strategy for the 1990's | This report states EPA policy, accompanied by implementation principles that reflect an aggressive approach to protecting the Nation's groundwater resources. The policy puts clear priority on preventing ground-water contamination, recognizes that groundwater is a uniquely local resource tor which states, and local governments must assume primary responsibility, and strives to improve EPA's coordination of groundwater activities under all relevant statutes and programs. | General Background Documents |
January 22, 2002 | In February 2000, EPA, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Environmental Technology Council reached a settlement agreement on pending litigation over CAMU regulations for remediation waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. CAMUs are special units which facilitate treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes managed for implementing cleanup, and to remove the disincentives to cleanup that the application of RCRA to these wastes can sometimes impose. The settlement was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Under the settlement, if EPA promulgates amendments to the CAMU rule described in the settlement and certain other conditions are met, the CAMU lawsuit will be dropped. | General Background Documents | |
February 16, 1993 | Federal Register: Corrective Action Management Units and Temporary Units; Corrective Action Provisions Under Subtitle C (58 FR 8658)(pdf)(3.9 MB) | EPA promulgated certain corrective action-related regulations under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The specific provisions finalized in this rulemaking address two new units that will be used for remedial purposes under RCRA corrective action authorities: corrective action management units, and temporary units. These specific provisions were proposed as part of a more comprehensive corrective action rulemaking on July 27, 1990. | Regulations |
May 1994 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Plan (pdf)(256 KB) | The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Plan is intended to aid Regions and States in determining and directing the specific work that a permittee/respondent must perform as part of a complete corrective action program. The CAP will assist the Regions and States in developing corrective action requirements in permits under RCRA Sections 3004(u) and (v) and 3005(c)(3) (omnibus) and corrective action orders under Sections 3008(h) and 7003. The CAP provides a framework for developing a site-specific schedule of compliance to be included in a permit or a corrective action order. OSWER Directive No. 9902.3-2A. | General Background Documents |
September 1998 | Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground Water (pdf)(2.5 MB) | The intent of this document is to present a technical protocol for data collection and analysis to evaluate monitored natural attenuation through biological processes for remediating groundwater. Natural attenuation processes, such as biodegradation, can often be dominant factors in the fate and transport of contaminants. So, consideration and quantification of natural attenuation is essential to a more thorough understanding of contaminant fate and transport. | General Background Documents |
April 21, 1999 | Use of Monitored Natural Attenuation at Superfund, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action and Underground Storage Tank Sites (pdf)(286 KB) | The purpose of this Directive is to clarify EPA’s policy regarding the use of monitored natural attenuation for the cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater in the Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and Underground Storage Tank programs. | General Background Documents |
March 2000 | Fact Sheet #2: Expectations for Final Remedies at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Facilities (pdf)(10.7 KB) | This fact sheet conveys the Agency’s general expectations for final remedies at RCRA Corrective Action facilities. EPA believes that an awareness of these expectations will help focus facility investigations as well as the evaluation and selection of remedial alternatives. | General Background Documents |
March 2000 | Fact Sheet #3: Final Remedy Selection for Results-Based Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action (pdf)(59.6 KB) |
If you are involved with RCRA Corrective Action as an EPA or State regulator, member of the public, or representative of a facility, this fact sheet can help you understand:
|
General Background Documents |
August 2000 | Environmental Fact Sheet: Amendments to the CAMU Rule Proposed (pdf)(19.8 KB) | EPA proposal to amend the 1993 Corrective Action Management Unit rule to provide additional detail to the framework for managing hazardous clean-up wastes in CAMUs. This proposal is intended to make the Agency’s general expectations for CAMUs clearer, and the CAMU process more consistent and predictable, as well as more explicit for the public. In these proposed amendments the Agency seeks to achieve the proper balance between providing national minimum standards while retaining the flexibility that is necessary to make site-specific CAMU decisions. | General Background Documents |
November 2002 | Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion into Indoor Air (pdf)(12.4 KB) | This guidance document addresses the evaluation and management of a single exposure pathway – the vapor intrusion pathway. The intent of these guidance documents is to provide a tool to help the user conduct a screening evaluation as to whether or not the vapor intrusion exposure pathway is complete and, if so, whether it poses an unacceptable risk to human health. A complete pathway means that humans are exposed to vapors originating from site contamination. The documents provide limited recommendations for delineating extent of risk or eliminating risk. | General Background Documents |
April 2004 | Handbook of Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Policies for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action (pdf)(423 KB) | This handbook and the accompanying documents are designed to help regulators, members of the regulated community, or members of the public find and understand EPA policies on protecting and cleaning up groundwater at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action facilities. This handbook contains EPA’s interpretation of policies on such topics as cleanup goals, the role of groundwater use, point of compliance, source control, and monitored natural attenuation. | General Background Documents |
October 2008 | Indoor Air Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Approaches | The National Risk Management Research Laboratory has developed a technology transfer document regarding management and treatment of vapor intrusion into building structures. This document describes the range of mitigation technologies available. The document also provides information on selecting appropriate technologies in consultation with qualified engineering and risk management professionals. | General Background Documents |
June 2011 | Background Indoor Air Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in North American Residences (1990 – 2005): A Compilation of Statistics for Assessing Vapor Intrusion | This technical report presents a summary of indoor air studies that measured background concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in the indoor air of thousands of North American residences and an evaluation and compilation of the statistical information reported in these studies. The objective of this compilation is to illustrate the ranges and variability of VOC concentrations in indoor air resulting from sources other than vapor intrusion. Similar compilations have been previously published, but these have been based on generally older data or limited statistical information. | General Background Documents |
February 2012 | Conceptual Model Scenarios for the Vapor Intrusion Pathway |
This report provides simplified simulation examples to illustrate graphically how subsurface conditions and building-specific characteristics determine:
It was prepared to help environmental practitioners gain insights into the processes and variables involved in the vapor intrusion pathway and to provide a theoretical framework with which to draw inferences about and better understand the complex vapor fate and transport conditions typically encountered at actual, non-idealized contaminated sites. |
General Background Documents |
March 2012 | Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Chlorinated Solvents Differ in Their Potential for Vapor Intrusion | This document describes how petroleum hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents behave differently in the subsurface and how these differences can influence whether there is a potential for vapor intrusion to occur. | General Background Documents |
March 16, 2012 | EPA's Vapor Intrusion Database: Evaluation and Characterization of Attenuation Factors for Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds and Residential Buildings | This report presents technical information about sites in the U.S. that have been investigated for vapor intrusion. The primary focus of the report is the evaluation of concentrations of chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds in and underneath residential buildings based upon EPA's vapor intrusion database as of 2010. The technical information provided in this report may be useful for regulators, responsible parties, and others assessing and managing vapor intrusion investigation programs. An erratum was issued on July 3, 2012, to correct Table 10. | General Background Documents |
April 2013 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action: Case Studies Report (pdf)(1.1 KB) | This report begins with an overview of the RCRA Corrective Action Program, including a discussion of the public health and environmental benefits of hazardous waste cleanups (Section I). Information on the number, location, size, and cleanup progress of corrective action facilities (Section II) is then followed by case studies that profile a series of ongoing cleanups (Section III). Together, their stories illustrate the inherent challenges and real benefits of RCRA Corrective Action. EPA believes this information will help government officials and the general public make better and more cost-effective policy and business decisions. | General Background Documents |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 1: Introduction and Course Overview (pdf)(294 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 2: How to Achieve the 2020 Vision (pdf)(752 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 3: Corrective Action Authorities and Guidance (pdf)(473 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 4: Starting with the End in Mind: Building an Exit Strategy (pdf)(624 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 5: Achieving Success: Practical Solutions to Corrective Action Challenges (pdf)(1.1 MB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 6: Corrective Action and Facilitating Land Revitalization (pdf)(492 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 7: Selecting and Approving a Protective Remedy Part 1 - Policy Considerations Part 2 - Field Considerations (pdf)(982 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 8: Greener Cleanups and Reuse Part 1 - Basic Concepts Part 2 - Implementation (pdf)(633 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 9: Managing Remediation Waste (pdf)(1.2 MB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 10: Corrective Action Optimization Tools and Challenge Exercise (pdf)(233 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 11: Maintaining Effective Remedy Performance (pdf)(740 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 12: Corrective Action Complete (pdf)(311 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 13: Challenge Exercise (pdf)(224 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to Yes! Module 14: Course Wrap-Up (pdf)(264 KB) |
Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
November 2009 | Modules 1-14: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Training Program: Getting to YES! Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision (pdf)(6.7 MB) | Course mission is to develop and enhance the skills of qualified personnel who will implement corrective actions for their sites by the year 2020 that are protective of human health and the environment while encouraging revitalization. | Training |
August 15, 2000 | Environmental Indicator Forum | On August 15-17, 2000, EPA's Office of Solid Waste sponsored the Environmental Indicator Forum. The purpose of the EI Forum was to bring together public and private stakeholders to hear presentations and discuss issues associated with achieving two environmental indicators at facilities subject to RCRA Corrective Action. The purpose of the first indicator, called Current Human Exposures Under Control, is to document whether or not humans are currently being exposed to unacceptable levels of contamination. The second indicator, called Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control, is intended to document whether or not contaminated groundwater is currently migrating beyond its outer limits above levels of concern. | Training |
May 18, 2016 | “Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track – a Toolbox for Corrective Action" (pdf)(630 KB) | Memo transmits the “Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track (RCRA FIRST) – a Toolbox for Corrective Action” user manual. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track - A Toolbox for Corrective Action (pdf)(6.8 MB) | This Toolbox and its attachments are intended to provide guidance to EPA personnel on implementing the RCRA Subtitle C program. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Model Corrective Action Framework Meeting Agenda (pdf)(114 KB) | The CAF Meeting Agenda is the most important tool in the Toolbox. This is the initial entry to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track process and the measurable RCRA Facility Investigation objectives that come from this meeting will anchor all subsequent activity and define the successful completion of the RFI. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 2: Corrective Action Framework Template (pdf)(164 KB) | For regulators and facilities wishing to utilize an RFI FIRST approach this model CAF Template 1 may be used as a tool for drafting the facility-specific CAF. The CAF is a tool generally intended to summarize the goals and expectations for the RFI process. A key principle of an RFI Lean approach is that the regulatory authority works with the facility through preliminary discussions early on in the RFI process to set up a CAF Meeting and then to develop the CAF. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 3: Elevation Process (pdf)(112 KB) | The current (“As-Is”) RCRA Facility Investigation/corrective measures study process does not include an explicit opportunity to use an informal process to raise an impasse to the next level of management for resolution. Participants in both RFI and CMS Lean events identified this as a root cause of inefficiency in the RFI/CMS process. If a problem arises, both parties might agree to “come back to it later” or decide to perform another round of sampling that may make the decision easier, which can delay the facility investigation and remedy selection process. Problems need to be resolved as they occur before they affect downstream process steps. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 4: RCRA Facility Investigation Data Sufficiency Evaluation (pdf)(158 KB) | RCRA Facility Investigation Data Sufficiency Evaluation Flow Chart | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 5: Conceptual Site Model Iterative Evaluation/Update Tool (pdf)(155 KB) | Conceptual Site Model Iterative Evaluation/Update Tool | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 6: Template Agenda for Remedy Selection Process Meeting (pdf)(116 KB) | Agenda for Remedy Selection Process Meeting | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 7: Developing Corrective Action Objectives (pdf)(147 KB) | RCRA FIRST addresses two phases of corrective action: facility investigation and remedy selection. The goal of a facility investigation is to determine the impact of a facility on human health and the environment. During remedy selection, the goal is to identify an effective remedy to protect human health and the environment. EPA, states, and facilities should work together to develop objectives for each of the two phases to meet these goals, consistent with EPA regulation, policy, and guidance. Objectives for facility investigation may initially be more generic and open-ended, as less is known about the specific environmental conditions prior to investigation; however, the findings of the investigation will form the basis for establishing the Corrective Action Objectives for remedy selection. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 8: Post-Remedial Care Considerations (pdf)(197 KB) | The purpose of this document is to provide project managers with a summary of RCRA Post-Remedial Care policy, tools, and examples that can bear on establishing Corrective Action Objectives during the Remedy Selection Process Meeting. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 9: Remedy Selection Process Document Template (pdf)(137 KB) | For regulators and facilities wishing to utilize the RCRA FIRST approach to remedy selection, this model Remedy Selection Process Document (RSPD) Template1 may be used as a tool for drafting the facility specific RSPD. The RSPD is a tool generally intended to summarize the site-specific goals and process to be used for remedy selection. A key component to a successful Lean approach to remedy selection is coordination between the regulatory authority and the facility to determine that the RFI is sufficient, and the conceptual site model is valid prior to, or at the beginning of the RSP Meeting and before development of the RSPD. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 10: Control Plan (pdf)(139 KB) | Document presents a table that outlines a Control Plan to track process improvements with RCRA FIRST. The control plan outlines the metric for each step in the facility investigation and remedy selection processes, the unit of measure for tracking, and the target measure of performance. Project managers can track progress in the “Current Quarter Status” column and take the suggested recovery actions where necessary. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 11: Communication Plan (pdf)(138 KB) | Document presents a table that outlines a step-by-step communications approach for the RCRA Facility Investigation and Remedy Selection processes, including the purpose of each meeting, the participants, the documents needed in advance, and applicable RCRA FIRST Tools. The Step # refers to the steps in the RFI and RSP full process maps, which are separate attachments not included in this Toolbox. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track TOOL 12: Project Manager Transition Checklist (pdf)(129 KB) | This transition checklist defines the steps and associated activities needed to facilitate seamless onboarding and/or transition of a new RCRA corrective action project manager within the EPA, Industry, and Consultants. The plan is specific to RCRA corrective action and is not inclusive of other on-boarding activities unrelated to corrective action. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Example: Corrective Action Framework Meeting Agenda for a Stalled Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Investigation (pdf)(168 KB) | This is an example of an agenda for a corrective action framework meeting that could be used for a stalled RFI. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Example: Corrective Action Framework for a New Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Investigation (pdf)(319 KB) | The CAF is a tool intended to summarize the goals and expectations of the U.S.EPA and the facility that will facilitate performance of a RCRA Facility Investigation at the captioned site. The CAF is not a legally binding document and is not a substitute for a permit or order. The CAF is not expected to address every technical or administrative aspect or detail of the RFI. Rather, the CAF summarizes the discussions that took place during the CAF meeting conducted at the facility on August 7, 2014. It is noted that the CAF is a “living document” and is subject to change in light of new information or data. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
May 20, 2016 | Example: Remedy Selection Process Meeting Agenda for Remedy Selection including Interim Measures (pdf)(197 KB) | This is an example of an agenda that could be used for a RSP meeting for remedy selection including interim measures. | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities Investigation Remedy Selection Track |
Multiple | Natural Attenuation Overview | This webpage contains general information about natural attenuation and a few resources. | Webpage |
Multiple | Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids Policy and Guidance | This webpage contains policy and guidance about dense nonaqueous phase liquids including links to federal and state guidance as well as cleanup guidance. | Webpage |
August 2012 | Summary of Technical Impracticability Waivers at National Priorities List Sites: Report with General Technical Impracticability Site Information Sheets (pdf)(1.8 MB) | The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of Technical Impracticability waivers that have been issued by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regions, and to distribute brief summaries of the completed TI waiver decisions, including a summary of the site conditions and the Regions’ rationale for adopting a TI waiver. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
Multiple |
On this webpage, you will find guidance and policy information related to Institutional Controls. |
Guidance and Policy Documents | |
January 19, 1995 | Consistent Implementation of the FY 1993 Guidance on Technical Impracticality of Ground-water Restoration at Superfund Sites (pdf)(801 KB) | This memorandum addresses implementation of the OSWER guidance entitled "Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration," dated September 1993. The purpose of the guidance is to clarify how to determine when ARAR-based cleanup levels may be waived for reasons of technical impracticability. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
September 2000 | Institutional Controls: A Site Manager's Guide to Identifying, Evaluating and Selecting Institutional Controls at Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Cleanups (pdf)(49.2 KB) |
A fact sheet that provides Superfund and RCRA CA site managers with an overview of Institutional Controls commonly used and factors to consider when selecting ICs as part of the remedy. |
Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 1, 2005 | A Citizen's Guide to Understanding Institutional Controls at Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facilities, Underground Storage Tanks, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Cleanups | The purpose of this guide is to provide community members with general information about the role of institutional controls in Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facilities, Underground Storage Tanks and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act cleanups occurring in their neighborhoods. This guide will also discuss the community’s role in providing input for the selection of ICs and helping to monitor them to ensure that human health and the environment remain protected in the future. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 2005 | Institutional Controls Bibliography: Institutional Control, Remedy Selection, and Post-Construction Completion Guidance and Policy (pdf)(78 KB) | The purpose of this document is to serve as a reference for policy guidelines concerning the use of institutional controls. The IC Bibliography covers 40 guidance and policy documents and provides citations and brief synopses of the IC use and policy information contained in each. It is anticipated that this document will prove useful to the Superfund program as it identifies, selects, plans, and implements ICs at sites nationwide. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 2005 | Institutional Controls: A Guide to Preparing Institutional Control Implementation and Assurance Plans at Contaminated Sites | The purpose of this document is to serve as a reference for policy guidelines concerning the use of institutional controls. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 2012 | Institutional Controls: A Guide to Planning, Implementing, Maintaining, and Enforcing Institutional Controls at Contaminated Sites |
The purpose of this guidance is to provide managers of contaminated sites, site attorneys,1 and other interested parties with information and recommendations that should be useful for planning, implementing, maintaining, and enforcing institutional controls for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund); Brownfields; federal facility; underground storage tank; and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act site cleanups. |
Guidance and Policy Documents |
Multiple | Superfund Risk Assessment | The Superfund risk assessment webpages provide guidance, tools and databases useful for preparing human health and ecological risk assessments on the types of hazardous waste sites addressed by EPA land cleanup programs. The Superfund risk assessment content may also help citizens and risk managers better understand Superfund's risk assessment process. | Webpage |
November 2023 | Regional Screening Levels - Generic Tables | This webpage contains the most recent Regional Screening Level tables. | Webpage |
Multiple | Vapor Intrusion Guidance | Vapor intrusion occurs when vapor-forming chemicals migrate from a subsurface source into an overlying building -- similar to radon gas seeping into homes. This website provides information about vapor intrusion and technical resources. | Webpage |
Multiple | Superfund Groundwater Completion Guidance | Due to the complexity of groundwater remediation, achieving site groundwater remedial action objectives can take years or even decades. This webpage provides guidance to help assess whether remedial action is working as anticipated and if remedial goals or technologies need to be modified to restore groundwater to beneficial use. | Webpage |
Multiple | The Contaminated Site Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) website | The CLU-IN website provides information about innovative treatment and site characterization technologies to the hazardous waste remediation community. | Webpage |
Multiple | CLU-IN Technologies - Remediation | Our technology guides collect information about many types of remediation technologies used to clean up contaminated sites. Current initiatives related to site cleanup, websites maintained by EPA and other federal agencies and state organizations, and recent documents are also included on this page. | Webpage |
Multiple | CLU-IN Technologies - Characterization and Monitoring | Our technology guides collect information about many types of technologies used to characterize and/or monitor a site before, during or after remediation work. Current initiatives related to site cleanup, websites maintained by EPA and other federal agencies and state organizations, and recent documents are also included on this page. | Webpage |
Multiple | EPA Tools and Resources Webinar Series | EPA's Office of Research and Development hosts this monthly public webinar series to translate EPA research and share research resources and information that are useful, practical/applied and available to meet research needs of states/territories and other entities, such as tribes, local governments, and communities. In addition, the EPA Tools and Resources Training Webinar Series provides in-depth overviews and step-by-step tutorials on popular EPA science-based models and tools. | Trainings |
Multiple | EPA Tools and Resources Training Webinar Series webpage | EPA's Office of Research and Development hosts this bimonthly public webinar series to provides in-depth overviews and step-by-step tutorials on popular EPA science-based models and tools. In addition, the EPA Tools and Resources Webinar Series translates EPA research and shares research resources and information that are useful, practical/applied and available to meet stakeholders' research needs. | Trainings |
March 2000 | Fact Sheet: History of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action (pdf)(44.5 KB) | This fact sheet provides an overview of the main events that have shaped the current Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action program. It also provides a brief history of the statutory authorities, regulations, and policy that form the framework for the program. | General Background Document |
October 7, 1999 | Federal Register: Subpart S Withdrawal (64 FR 54604)(pdf)(126 KB) | As part of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Cleanup Reforms, EPA announced its intention to withdraw most provisions of the 1990 Subpart S proposal (under Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 264), thereby paving the way for implementation of more flexible Corrective Action approaches. | Regulation |
July 27, 1990 | Federal Register: Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units at Hazardous Waste Management Facilities - Proposed Rule for Subpart S (55 FR 30798)(4.4 MB) | The purpose of Proposed Subpart S is to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for implementing EPA’s Corrective Action Program under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. This proposal serves to promote national consistency in implementing this important component of the RCRA program, and establishes standards to which States seeking authorization for the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 section 3004(u) Corrective Action must demonstrate equivalence. | Regulation |
January 17, 1997 | Use of the Corrective Action Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking as Guidance (pdf)(16.5 KB) | The ANPR has several purposes: it introduces EPA’s strategy for improving the Corrective Action Program (the Subpart S Initiative), requests information to assist in identifying and developing program improvements, provides a status report on the Corrective Action Program and guidance on program implementation, and highlights areas of flexibility within the program and program improvements currently underway. This memorandum emphasizes our expectation that the ANPR will be used as guidance. | Regulation |
May 1, 1996 | Federal Register: Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units at Hazardous Waste Management Facilities Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (61 FR 19432)(pdf)(360 KB) | This notice introduces the EPA’s strategy for development of Corrective Action regulations and guidance, requests comments on a broad range of Corrective Action issues, provides a status report on the Corrective Action Program, and emphasizes areas of flexibility within current Corrective Action implementation. | Regulation |
Multiple | Frequent Questions About Corrective Action | This webpage provides answers to frequent questions about Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action. | Webpage |
Multiple | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Enforcement | This website addresses the Agency's RCRA enforcement authority for investigation and cleanup when waste is not properly managed at RCRA facilities. EPA may use its enforcement authority under RCRA to require the owners and operators to perform the cleanup work. | Webpage |
February 8, 2024 | Federal Register: Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents Proposed Rule | This proposal would change the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regulations by adding nine particular per- and polyfluoroalkyl compounds, their salts, and their structural isomers, to its list of hazardous constituents in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 261 Appendix VIII. | Regulations |
February 8, 2024 | Federal Register: Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units Proposed Rule (89 FR 8606) | This proposal would amend the definition of hazardous waste as it applies to corrective action to address releases from solid waste management units at permitted hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. | Regulations |
October 2014 | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Orientation Manual |
This manual provides introductory information on the solid and hazardous waste management programs under RCRA. Designed for EPA and state staff, members of the regulated community, and the general public who wish to better understand RCRA, this document constitutes a review of the RCRA program and is not a substitute for RCRA or its implementing regulations. EPA has finalized a several rules that make changes to the solid and hazardous waste regulations. This document has not been updated yet to reflect these regulatory changes. |
General Background Document |
Multiple | Corrective Action Cleanups Around the Nation | On this website you can find Information on corrective action facilities in your area, and reuse. | Webpage |
April 5, 2001 | Reflecting Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Cleanup Reforms in Memorandum of Agreements Between EPA and States Authorized for Corrective Action (pdf)(12.3 KB) | This is EPA’s announcement of the RCRA Cleanup Reforms in July of 1999 emphasized a results-oriented focus, more flexible approaches, and meeting Environmental Indicators. On January 11, 2001, OSWER announced a second set of reforms that built upon the July 1999 reforms and added new initiatives to strengthen them. EPA’s operating agreements with State agencies should reflect and emphasize the RCRA Cleanup Reforms. For that purpose, as a component of the second round of reforms, EPA has developed the model language set forth in this memorandum for States to include in new or renegotiated Memorandum of Agreement (MOAs) where States are authorized for RCRA Corrective Action. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
May 2004 | Guidance on Surface Soil Cleanup at Hazardous Waste Sites: Implementing Cleanup Levels (pdf)(416 KB) | This document provides guidance on approaches to surface soil cleanup that address these considerations and can help risk managers balance the sometimes-competing demands of human health risk reduction and remediation cost containment. Risk assessors and statisticians will also find this guidance useful in providing information needed to support risk management decisions. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
Multiple | Financial Assurance for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Cleanups | This webpage explains covering cleanup costs through financial assurance. | Webpage |
Multiple | Closure and Corrective Action | This is a section of the “Closure and Post-Closure Care Requirements for Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities” webpage focused on corrective action. | Webpage |
October 22, 1998 | Federal Register: Standards Applicable to Owners and Operators of Closed and Closing Hazardous Waste Management Facilities; Post-Closure Permit Requirement; Closure Process (Post-Closure Rule) (63 FR 56710)(pdf)(269 KB) |
This document is a Federal Register notice regarding closure requirements for hazardous waste management facilities. EPA amended regulations under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act in two areas. First, EPA modified the requirements for a post-closure permit, to allow EPA and the authorized States to use a variety of authorities to impose requirements on non-permitted land disposal units requiring post-closure care. Second, for all facilities, the EPA amended the regulations governing closure of land-based units that have released hazardous constituents, to allow certain units to be addressed through the Corrective Action Program. |
Regulations |
March 16, 1998 | Risk-Based Clean Closure Memo (pdf)(61.6 KB) | The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on risk-based clean closure and to confirm that, under current regulations, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regulated units may be clean closed to protective, risk-based media cleanup levels. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
September 30, 2003 | Interim Guidance: Financial Responsibility for Facilities Subject to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action | This document provides decision makers guidance in the implementation of financial responsibility requirements to ensure that owners and operators provide evidence of financial responsibility for corrective action that may become necessary in the future. This guidance will also assist the states that are authorized for Corrective Action in the implementation of financial assurance requirements. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
November 2023 | Regional Screening Levels Users Guide | This user's guide recommends an approach based upon currently available information about risk assessment on Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act sites. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
Multiple | Maximum Contaminant Levels in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 141: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | In this section of the regulations, you can find the national primary drinking water maximum contaminant levels. | Regulations |
Multiple | Maximum Contaminant Levels in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 143: National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations | In this section of the regulations, you can find the national secondary drinking water maximum contaminant levels. | Regulations |
February 6, 2024 | Climate Change Adaptation Considerations and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Process | This memorandum conveys recommendations for EPA regions and RCRA authorized states about how to work with RCRA facility owners and operators to integrate climate change adaptation considerations into the RCRA corrective action process. This integration will help protect human health and the environment by ensuring that RCRA corrective action cleanups remain effective and prevent the migration of hazardous waste or constituents. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
Multiple | Calculating Preliminary Remediation Goals | This webpage explains PRGs and how these concentration values are calculated. It also contains several resources for developing PRGs and statistical methods for assessing attainment of goals. | Webpage |
Multiple | Remedial Action Plans found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 270 subpart H | Remedial Action Plans are special forms of permits that are regulated under subpart H of 40 CFR Part 270. | Regulations |
Multiple | Search for Corrective Action and Progress Track Facilities | On this webpage, you can search for corrective action and progress track facilities around the nation. | Webpage |
Multiple | List of Corrective Action-related memos in RCRA Online | Access all corrective action-related memos in EPA’s RCRA online system. | Webpage |
Multiple | Vapor Intrusion Resources | This webpage contains technical documents, tools, other resources, and links related to vapor intrusion. | Webpage |
June 2015 | Technical Guide for Addressing Petroleum Vapor Intrusion at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites (pdf)(2.8 MB) | This guidance focuses on releases of petroleum-based fuels (e.g., gasoline, diesel) from underground storage tanks, which are typically located at gas stations. This guide applies to new and existing releases of petroleum-based fuels from leaking USTs and to previously closed sites, where the implementing agency has reason to suspect that there may be a potential for petroleum vapor intrusion. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
June 2015 | Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air | This technical guidance presents EPA’s technical recommendations based on our current understanding of vapor intrusion into indoor air from subsurface vapor sources. One of its main purposes is to promote national consistency in assessing the vapor intrusion pathway. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 21, 1988 | Federal Register: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act National Contingency Plan Proposed Rule (53 FR 51394; 51444)(pdf)(37.5 MB) | The original area of contamination policy concept was first articulated in the NCP for public comment in this proposed rule. | Regulations |
December 27, 1989 | Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Groundwater Treatment Reinjection (pdf)(745 KB) | This memorandum explains EPA’s interpretation of whether the LDRs are applicable or (under CERCLA response actions only) relevant and appropriate to reinjections or to the remediation as a whole. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
August 1994 | Clarification to the 1994 Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Sites and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Facilities (pdf)(157 KB) | This directive clarifies the policy on using EPA’s Science Advisory Board reviewed Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model and blood lead studies, determining the geographic area to use in evaluating human exposure to lead contamination, addressing multimedia lead contamination, and determining appropriate response actions at lead sites. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
July 1989 | Determining When Land Disposal Restrictions Are Applicable to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Response Actions (pdf)(234 KB) | Information on when placement does and does not occur. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
April 6, 1990 | Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Response Activities and the Land Disposal Restrictions Program's Applicability at Plattsburgh Air Force Base (pdf)(9.7 KB) | Discussion of the applicability of the land disposal restrictions to CERCLA. Disposal within an area of contamination is not subject to minimum technological requirements. Discussion of treatability variances at CERCLA sites. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 8, 1990 | Federal Register: National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan Final Rule (55 FR 8758)(pdf)(26.9 MB) | AOC concept was discussed in detail in the preamble to the NCP. NCP also discusses using the concept of “placement” to determine which requirements might apply within an area of contamination. The concept of “placement” is important because placement of hazardous waste into a landfill or other land-based unit is considered land disposal, which triggers the land disposal restrictions, and may trigger other RCRA requirements including permitting (at a non-Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act site), closure and post closure. In the NCP, EPA stated, “placement does not occur when waste is consolidated within an AOC, when it is treated in situ, or when it is left in place. Placement does occur, and additional RCRA requirements may be triggered, when wastes are moved from one AOC to another (e.g., for consolidation) or when waste is actively managed (e.g., treated ex situ) within or outside the AOC and returned to the land. | Regulations |
September 5, 1990 | Applicability of Permitting to Movement of Hazardous Waste That Does Not Constitute Land Disposal (pdf)(13.6 KB) | Land disposal includes movement of hazardous waste into a unit, but not movement within the unit. Movement within the unit does not require a permit. Movement of hazardous waste within a unit that is associated with land treatment may require a treatment permit. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
September 26, 1990 | Subtitle C Impermeable Cap Requirement for On-Site Containment of Wood Preserving Wastes (pdf)(41.5 KB) | EPA grants ARAR waiver of landfill impermeable cap requirement for waste treated to LDR variance from treatment standard. The consolidation of wastes within an area of contamination, not replacement unit, does not trigger minimum technological requirements | Guidance and Policy Documents |
October 9, 1990 | Contaminated Soil and Debris Treated Replacement Under a Treatability Variance (pdf)(37 KB) | An area of contamination designated by the Region during RCRA corrective action is a RCRA unit. Waste is not subject to land disposal restrictions, and the unit is not subject to minimum technological requirements. This memo discusses corrective action management units. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
January 7, 1991 | Applicability of “Superfund Land Disposal Restrictions Guides"(pdf)(32.8 KB) | This guidance discusses the use of Superfund and National Contingency Plan guidance at Resource Conservation and Recovery Act sites. The area of contamination, placement concept, and LDR treatability variances apply to RCRA corrective action, state, and voluntary cleanups of RCRA waste. In-situ treatment may not be placement. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
April 16, 1991 | Land Disposal Restrictions Applicability to Investigative Derived Waste (pdf)(4.9 KB) | The temporary container storage of investigative-derived wastes within an area of contamination followed by disposal within the original AOC does not trigger land disposal restrictions. The movement to separate storage and/or treatment area followed by replacement may trigger treatment. A single drum is not considered a unit. Drums and land on which drums are placed may constitute container storage areas. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
June 11, 1992 | Clarification of the Applicability of Certain Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Requirements to Common Excavation-Type Activities (pdf)(32.1 KB) | Excavating and redepositing hazardous soils (active management) within an area of contamination during trenching or other non-RCRA related construction is not generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste and triggers no RCRA requirements, including land disposal restrictions and generator rules. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
September 15, 1995 | Clarification of the RCRA "Contained-In" Policy (51.3 KB) | Pursuant to the contained-in policy, environmental media that contains listed hazardous waste must be managed as hazardous waste because, and only so long as, it contains listed hazardous waste. The in-situ treatment and movement of contaminated media within an AOC is not land disposal. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 13, 1996 | Use of the Area of Contamination Concept During Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Cleanups (pdf)(54.1 KB) | This memorandum confirms that under current regulations, certain broad areas of contamination may be considered RCRA landfills. Under certain conditions, hazardous wastes may be moved within such areas without triggering RCRA land disposal restrictions or minimum technology requirements. This memorandum also describes the distinctions between the final Corrective Action Management Unit regulations and the Area of Contamination approach and encourages appropriate use of both options to expedite remedial actions. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
November 27, 1996 | Permitting and Land Disposal Requirements for Management of Contaminated Soil Which Is Hazardous or Contains Hazardous Waste (pdf)(37.8 KB) | Non-exempt remediation activities involving treatment of hazardous waste or media are subject to RCRA permitting even if the cleanup is under state requirements other than RCRA or CERCLA. States with permit waiver authority may waive the permit requirements for cleanups if the waiver is not used in a manner less stringent than that allowed under federal authority. If the state remediation standards are less stringent, waste must meet the LDR treatment standards before placement. The use of a corrective action management unit or area of contamination concept will not trigger LDR requirements. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 10, 1997 | Applicability of the Domestic Sewage Exclusion (pdf)(16 KB) | The domestic sewage exclusion extends to both listed and characteristic wastes which pass through sewer system to a publicly owned treatment works. Sewage is subject to CWA and exempt from RCRA. Waste removed or leaked from a sewer line does not meet the conditions of the exemption. Releases from a sewage line could be solid waste management units or areas of contamination. The definition of facility for corrective action is dependent on site-specific factors. Releases from SWMUs at permitted facilities are addressed under Sections 3004(u) or 3004(v) authority. Non-SWMU related releases, both within and beyond the facility boundary, are addressed under Section 3005(c)(3) omnibus permitting authority; releases at interim status facilities addressed under Section 3008(h) interim status corrective action orders. Domestic sewage is defined as untreated sanitary wastes that passes through a sewer system. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 19, 1999 | Application of Area of Contamination Policy to Remediation of Wood Treating Sites (pdf)(75.7 KB) | AOC policy provides that certain discrete areas of generally dispersed contamination can be considered as Resource Conservation and Recovery Act units (usually a landfill), and that consolidation and in-situ treatment conducted within AOC do not trigger land disposal restrictions (also refer to: 63 FR 28620; 5/26/98). EPA believes that wood treating sites can be excellent candidates for use of AOCs. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 5, 2001 | Training on the Handbook of Ground Water Protection and Cleanup policies for RCRA Corrective Action | This seminar will provide an overview of the recently finalized Handbook that contains EPA’s latest interpretations of policies on topics such as, cleanup goals, groundwater use, point of compliance, source control, and completing groundwater remedies. The Handbook ties all 15 different topics together with an overall Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Strategy that emphasizes a phased, results-based approach to cleaning up contaminated groundwater. Although the Handbook focuses on RCRA Corrective Action, EPA believes the plain language of the policy descriptions, and the Internet links to over 50 more detailed resources will be helpful to anyone involved with groundwater protection and cleanup. Seminar participants will hear the authors describe: key background information that led to developing the Handbook; primary goals and messages; the innovative format of the Handbook; and summaries of policies associated with individual topics. Time will also be provided for questions and answers. | Training |
October 2001 | Fact Sheet: Handbook of Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Policies for RCRA Corrective Action | This fact sheet summarizes the Handbook, which is a user-friendly, comprehensive publication to help you find and understand numerous policies concerning groundwater protection and cleanup. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
October 15, 2001 | Correspondence to RCRA Regional Senior Policy Advisors, State Directors, and Interested Members of the Regulated Community and the Public re: Handbook of Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Policies for RCRA Corrective Action (Final Version) | EPA's goal for this Handbook is that it will help meet these objectives by reducing time-consuming uncertainties and confusion about EPA's current policies concerning groundwater protection and cleanup at RCRA facilities. | Correspondence and Memoranda |
October 17, 2001 | Announcement of Availability of the Final Version of the “Handbook of Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Policies for RCRA Corrective Action” | The intent of this notice is to announce the availability of the final version of the “Handbook of Groundwater Protection and Cleanup Policies for RCRA Corrective Action.” | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 2010 | Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Cross-Program Revitalization Measures (pdf)(3.3 MB) | This report presents the EPA OSWER’s Fiscal Year 2009 Cross-Program Revitalization Measures. The CPRM were developed to define and communicate how much contaminated or potentially contaminated land OSWER’s cleanup and revitalization programs address, and the progress being made to clean up the sites and where possible enable reuse at sites overseen by these programs. These measures integrate all of OSWER’s cleanup programs and allow us to express assessment and cleanup progress in terms of acres and sites, providing more integrated and clearly defined performance reporting. The CPRM is composed of the universe indicator, the protective for people under current conditions performance measure, and the ready for anticipated use performance measure. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
February 21, 2007 | Guidance for Documenting and Reporting Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C Corrective Action Land Revitalization Indicators and Performance Measures (pdf) |
The guidance assists EPA and state officials in documenting and reporting measures and indicators for RCRA Corrective Action facilities. |
Guidance and Policy Documents |
April 2, 2012 | RCRA Ready for Anticipated Use (RAU) Document Form 2008 (pdf) |
The guidance assists EPA and state officials in documenting and reporting measures and indicators for RCRA Corrective Action facilities. |
Guidance and Policy Documents |
Multiple | RCRAInfo Data Element Dictionary |
The RCRAInfo Data Element Dictionary defines the basic organization associated with the RCRAInfo Database. The dictionary consists of the following primary topics:
|
Webpage |
February 5, 1999 | Guidance on Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination (pdf) | Interim-final, revised guidance on how to determine if a facility has met the RCRA corrective action Environmental Indicators. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
October 23, 2023 | Fiscal Year 2023 Government Performance and Results Act Achievements Spreadsheet (xlsx) | This spreadsheet shows the final end of year corrective action measures results for FY 2023. | General Background Document |
June 5, 2013 | Corrective Action Framework Guide (pdf) | This document is EPA's Six Sigma RCRA CAF Guide and explains the RCRA Facility Investigation Lean process from 2013. | General Background Document |
November 3, 2009 | RCRA Corrective Action Training: Getting to Yes! Strategies for Achieving the 2020 Vision (pdf) | Agenda for EPA's Region 7 training held November 3-5, 2009. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
November 3, 2009 | Corrective Action Universe (pdf) | Flowchart of the corrective action process color coded to show which days of the training would cover which parts of the process. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
November 3, 2009 | List of Acronyms (pdf) | List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective action-related acronyms from A to X. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
November 3, 2009 | RCRA Corrective Action Timeline (pdf) | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective action regulatory and statutory timeline from 1976-2008. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
April 10, 2008 | Sustainable Land Revitalization (pdf) | Draft one-pager about opportunities to conserve resources, reduce impacts to the community, and reduce impacts on human health and the environment in order to maximize the benefits associated with a land revitalization project. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
November 3, 2009 | RCRA Land Revitalization Indicators Status of Use &Type of Use, 2007 (pdf) | Example Form that regions and states can use. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
November 3, 2009 | RCRA Ready for Anticipated Use (RAU) Document Form 2008 (pdf) | Form used to document a facility's ready for anticipated use determination for the whole facility or a designated area. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
November 3, 2009 | Decision Tree - RCRA "Ready for Anticipated Use" Measure (pdf) | Flow chart to guide a facility in making a RCRA “Ready for Anticipated Use” determination. (Handout for the RCRA Corrective Action Training Strategies for Meeting the 2020 Vision) | Training |
October 2024 | Temporary Units Compendium (pdf) | EPA developed this compendium of supporting memos, regulations, and policies about temporary units, which are temporary tanks and container storage areas used to treat or store hazardous remediation wastes during remedial activities. | General Background Document |
October 2024 | Area of Contamination and Corrective Action Management Units Compendium (pdf) | EPA developed this compendium of supporting memos, regulations, and policies about areas of contamination (certain discrete areas of generally dispersed contamination) and corrective action management units (areas within facilities that are used only for managing remediation wastes for implementing corrective action or cleanup at the facilities). |
General Background Document |
August 23, 1988 | Memo from Lowrance to Reich about the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring Comments on the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Rule (pdf)(32.9 KB) | This memo clarifies issues related to the RCRA corrective action rule including corrective action management units, temporary units, point of departure, target levels, and protectiveness. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 27, 1991 | Memo from Friedman to the Regions about the Use of Proposed Subpart S Corrective Action Rule as Guidance Pending Promulgation of the Final Rule (pdf)(39.4 KB) | This memo explains that the interpretive portions of proposed the Subpart S corrective action rule may be used as guidance and that the proposed changes may not be used as guidance. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
February 10, 1992 | Memo from Clay to Reilly about the Environmental Growth Initiative (pdf)(55.8 KB) | This memo provides an overview of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C reform initiatives growing out of the President's "90-Day Review of Regulations." It also addresses concentration-based exemptions, universal treatment standards, post-closure permitting, remediation reforms, and the new Superfund paradigm. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
January 17, 2024 | “Updated Residential Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities" (pdf)(420 KB) | In this memo, EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management updated its residential soil lead regional screening level and regional removal management level for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known as “Superfund” remedial and removal programs, respectively, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action program. The information and recommendations in this guidance also apply to federal facility cleanup programs subject to CERCLA section 120, and potentially to federal agencies using response action authorities delegated to them under Executive Order 12580. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
June 26, 2024 | Implementation of EPA’s “Updated Residential Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities” at Federal Facilities (pdf)(246 KB) | Under CERCLA, the information and recommendations in the Updated Guidance also apply to federal facility cleanup programs subject to CERCLA Section 120, and potentially to federal agencies using response action authorities at non-NPL sites delegated to them under Executive Order 12580 (OFR, 1987). Under RCRA, the information and recommendations in the Updated Guidance apply to federal facility corrective action cleanups that are implemented by EPA. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
1987 | Executive Order 12580 - Superfund Implementation | This Executive Order delegates to a number of Federal departments and agencies the authority and responsibility to implement certain provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The policies and procedures for implementing these provisions are spelled out in the National Contingency Plan. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
April 26, 2002 | Role of Background in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Cleanup Program (pdf)(644 KB) | This document clarifies EPA's preferred approach for the consideration of background constituent concentrations of hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants in certain steps of the remedy selection process, such as risk assessment and risk management, at CERCLA or "Superfund" sites. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
2002 | Guidance for Comparing Background and Chemical Concentrations in Soil for CERCLA Sites (pdf)(1.2 MB) | Guidance for background and chemical concentrations for soil for CERCLA sites. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
March 2024 | Superfund Residential Lead Sites Handbook (pdf)(6.6 MB) | EPA developed this Handbook to promote national consistency when assessing and managing risks associated with lead-contaminated residential sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund. This is an update to the Superfund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook, August 2003, reflecting best practices, guidance, and policy for lead site characterizations, risk assessments, and risk management. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
February 2024 | Supplemental Framework: Selecting a Remedial Screening Level for Residential Soil Lead (pdf)(169 KB) | Supplemental framework for selecting a remedial screening level for residential soil lead. | Guidance and Policy Documents |
December 19, 2024 |
This memo and the attached appendix titled “Improved Procedures for Facility/Site Transfers Between RCRA [Resource Conservation and Recovery Adt] Hazardous Waste and CERCLA Cleanup Authorities,” describe updated procedures for processing program transfers of facilities/sites between the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Hazardous Waste Cleanup Program (formerly known as the Corrective Action Program) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Program. The updated procedures, which include documenting and tracking transfer-related information in both RCRAInfo and the Superfund Enterprise and Management System (SEMS), will help ensure that facilities/sites transferred between these programs follow a consistent and complete process. The updated process will enable program managers to accurately identify a facility/site’s administrative program management lead, transfer status in real time and improve overall program management at the state, regional, and national levels. |
Guidance and Policy Documents | |
December 19, 2024 | This appendix is a companion document to the memo “Improved Procedures for Facility/Site Transfers Between RCRA [Resource Conservation and Recovery Act] Hazardous Waste Cleanup and CERCLA Cleanup Authorities” (OLEM Directive #9932.2 December 2024). The memo describes updated procedures for processing program transfers of facilities/sites between the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Hazardous Waste Cleanup Program (formerly known as the Corrective Action Program) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This appendix’s purpose is to support the memo’s implementation by providing additional detail concerning administrative and documentation requirements. | Guidance and Policy Documents |