EPA EcoBox Tools by Effects - Terrestrial
Overview
Eco-SSLs are concentrations of contaminants in soil that are protective of ecological receptors that commonly come into contact with and/or consume biota that live in or on soil. They are derived separately for four groups of ecological receptors: plants, soil invertebrates, mammals, and birds. In deriving Eco-SSLs, only chronic toxicity studies (greater than a 3-day exposure) were accepted for mammalian and avian studies. Although acute studies were not excluded for plants and soil invertebrates, the exposure duration was considered later in the process for selecting the most appropriate test results for deriving the Eco-SSL.
The Eco-SSLs are intended for use in upland soils; however, they may also be useful for screening wetland soils. The wildlife Eco-SSLs are derived for several general receptor groups that are likely to be representative of wildlife found in wetlands, but are not derived for amphibians and reptiles. The Eco-SSLs for plants and soil invertebrates are expected to be broadly applicable (i.e., conservative enough for most soils) as preference was given to studies with high bioavailability of the contaminants in soils. For this reason, the Eco-SSLs for plants and soil invertebrates may be useful for screening for contaminants in wetland soils.
The following table summarizes the availability of EPA’s Eco-SSL values.
| Eco-SSL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stressor | Status | Terrestrial Plants | Soil Invertebrates | Mammalian Wildlife | Avian Wildlife |
| Aluminum | Interim final (2003) | Narrative statement | |||
| Antimony | Interim final (2005) | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Arsenic | Interim final (2005) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Barium | Interim final (2005) | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Beryllium | Interim final (2005) | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Cadmium | Interim final (2005) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Chromium (III) | Interim final (2008) | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Chromium (IV) | Interim final (2008) | No | No | Yes | No |
| Cobalt | Interim final (2005) | Yes | No | Yes | yes |
| Copper | Interim final (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| DDT and metabolites | 2007 | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Dieldrin | Interim final (2007) | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Iron | Interim final (2003) | Narrative statement | |||
| Lead | Interim final (2005) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Manganese | Interim final (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Nickel | Interim final (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) | Interim final (2007) | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Pentachlorophenol | Interim final (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Selenium | Interim final (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Silver | Interim final (2006) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Vanadium | Interim final (2005) | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Zinc | Interim final (2007) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Source: EPA Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance
EPA’s ECOTOXicology database (ECOTOX) is a source for locating single chemical toxicity data for aquatic life, terrestrial plants, and terrestrial wildlife. ECOTOX integrates three previously independent databases (AQUIRE, PHYTOTOX, and TERRETOX) into a unique system that includes toxicity data derived predominately from the peer-reviewed literature.
Other Federal agencies, state agencies, and some EPA regions have compiled soil screening criteria for the protection of terrestrial plants and animals. See the table below for links to these websites.
| Federal Agency Websites | |
|---|---|
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | Ecological Soil Screening Level (Eco-SSL) Guidance and Documents Superfund Soil Screening Guidance Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) - Generic Tables |
| National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) | Screening Quick Reference Tables (SQuiRTs) |
| U.S. DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) | Ecological Benchmark Tool Preliminary Remediation Goals for Ecological Endpoints (41 pp, 139 K, About PDF) |
| U.S. EPA Regional Websites | |
| Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee | Region 4 Ecological Risk Assessment Supplemental Guidance Interim Draft (80 pp, 972 K, About PDF)(Soil Screening Values) |
| Region 5: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin | Ecological Screening Levels |
| U.S. State Websites The following links exit the site | |
| Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) | Soil Remediation Levels (SRLs) (40 pp, 183 K, About PDF) |
| California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) | Environmental Screening Levels Risk Assessment: Soil and Soil Gas |
| Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Florida DEP) | Soil Cleanup Target Levels |
| Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) | Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) |
| Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) | Contaminated sediments |
| New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) | Ecological Screening Criteria (7 pp, 51 K, About PDF) Soil Remediation Standards (47 pp, 828 K, About PDF) |
| New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) | New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program: Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives Technical Support Document (363 pp, 1.07 MB, About PDF) |
| Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) | Generic Numerical Standards (31 pp, 173 K, About PDF) |
| Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) | Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Protective Concentration Levels |
| Washington Department of Ecology | Cleanup Levels and Risk Calculation (CLARC) Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Use Soil Cleanup Levels for Industrial Land Use |
| Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) | Soil Cleanup Standards |
Tools
The resources listed below include tools that might be used to calculate dose/risk to terrestrial receptors as well as documents that describe how to quantify dose/risk or provide reference values/benchmarks for assessing risks.